Or even worse, is your game suffering as a result of a fitness program? The great golfers are those who can exert a fine degree of control over the club and ultimately the ball. The skills required range from developing power to hit the ball over distance to being able to apply the deftest of touches on the green.

I've worked with golfers who have spent so much time in the gym to increase their power they have actually stiffened up by reducing their range of movement. Worse still, when the try to use this new found strength on the course they tense up in the belief they are using their muscles effectively. However, it's not just a matter of reduced movement that's the problem. The level of control demonstated by the game's greats is achieved through sensitivity. Tense muscles are not sensitive and reduce what you will feel through your hands, make it harder to get the right amount of power for each shot and eventually lead to injury.

Strength is a liability if coordination is missing. Top players of all sports have poise, coordination and, as a result, are sensitive to what is required at each moment of a game and better able to carry out the actions necessary to meet those requirements. Golf strengthening programs can help, but only if you know how to use your new strength out on the course.

Also see A Poised Golfer Is A Happy Golfer
 


Comments

Adrian
07/06/2011 1:16pm

I completely agree and surprised this isn't debated more often. I do think strength training is helpful for endurance and stability, but to your point, if it comes at the expense of coordination, or more specifically the application of proper dynamics, it's a huge liability.

No amount of strength training will ever create greater club head speed, for example, than maintaining proper lag and insuring the swing bottom occurs ahead of the ball vs. at or behind the ball... No amount of strength training will insure the dynamics that enforce ball flight accuracy, etc.

It's not to suggest that fitness doesn't matter... It's critical for core stability which in turn is required to apply proper dynamics... but must I would say flexibility and lean muscle mass is probably more applicable to golf than bulk.

Reply
Roy
07/07/2011 10:35am

Thanks Adrian, I think the issue is the definition of fitness. For too long, the idea of fitness meant strength, stamina etc. But when someone talks about getting fit, I like to ask 'fit to do what?' Fitness requirements are different for every sport, personally I believe if someone is well-coordinated and they play their sport, they'll get fit for that sport. If they play well they'll get better, if they play badly and their technique is in question (due to questionable coordination) then they'll get better at playing badly :0)

Thanks again Adrian for taking the time to post your comment.

Roy

Reply



Leave a Reply